Trials in southern New South Wales and northern Victoria have shown that double cropping success relies on quick and seamless transitions between the winter and summer crop phases, and the results are helping growers weigh up the benefits of the approach.
The trials feed data into a Decision Support Tool (DST) for Double Cropping, which provides an easy way for irrigators to assess the gross margins of different rotations, attribute an average water price to those rotations and customise inputs, yields and commodity prices for their own circumstances.
The research was made possible through significant contributions of growers through trial cooperation and investment by the Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC). The project Correct Crop Sequencing (Double Cropping) was conducted by NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) at the Yanco Agricultural Institute (YAI) as well as the Irrigated Cropping Council (ICC) in Northern Victoria.
NSW DPI research and development agronomist, Tony Napier, and his team conducted large-scale field trials of irrigated winter and summer crops at YAI’s Leeton Field Station.
“We ran trials for two and a half years, or five seasons, which focused on wheat, canola, barley, faba beans, soybeans, maize and cotton rotations and their gross margins to inform and develop the DST,” Mr Napier said.
Researcher Damian Jones said individual crops within a double cropping system can be quite profitable and therefore double cropping does make financial sense, but enthusiasm, infrastructure, equipment, profitable crops and capability have to be available.
“Double cropping has been practiced previously across the irrigation zone, but widespread adoption has been hampered by numerous issues such as water availability, commodity prices and profitable crop choices,” Mr Jones said.